
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
LATEST POSTS
- 1
1st-ever disease gene fix, Alzheimer's blood test: 7 medical breakthroughs in 2025 - 2
NASA's Artemis 2 astronauts are cruising to the moon. So why are they doing CPR tests today? - 3
Step by step instructions to Shield Your Wellbeing Around 5G Pinnacles\ - 4
The Best Competitors of the 21st Hundred years - 5
My Enterprising Excursion: Building a Startup
US FDA investigates Takeda's blood disorder drug after pediatric death
Medical team successfully delivers baby and removes massive tumor
10 Famous Frozen yogurt Flavors All over The Planet
Creativity Revealed: A Survey of \Making Shocking Looks\ Cosmetics Item
‘This year nearly broke me as a scientist’ – US researchers reflect on how 2025’s science cuts have changed their lives
19 Peculiar Films You Shouldn't Watch With Your Mum
Cannabis reclassification could 'open the floodgates' for research, scientists say
Investigating the Advantages of a Bank account: A Complete Aide
The gay hockey show no one saw coming — and everyone is suddenly obsessed with













